Don't Lie to MeMichigan's 4th District, by the numbers
Trade & Manufacturing

Tariffs, trade policy, and MI-4's manufacturing base

Manufacturing is the largest single employer in both Allegan and Van Buren counties, which makes tariff policy one of the more concrete ways federal action reaches this district's paychecks. This piece lays out who's actually here, what the 2025 tariffs actually do, and a vote that matters more than either of those on its own: the one where Huizenga helped block Congress's own tool for checking the tariffs in the first place.

Context: tariff impact is genuinely hard to measure at the congressional-district level. Nobody publishes a "how much did the steel tariff cost Allegan County" figure, so this piece stays close to what can actually be sourced: employment concentration by sector, the tariffs' own text and effective dates, and the roll call that shaped Congress's ability to act on either. Where I'd need a countywide or district-specific economic model that doesn't exist, I'll say that plainly rather than estimate one myself.

Who's actually here

County-level employment
~25%
Share of Allegan County's workforce employed in manufacturing — the largest single sector, ahead of retail and health care.
Source: Census ACS via DataUSA
7,970
Manufacturing jobs in Van Buren County — also the county's largest employment sector, ahead of health care and retail.
Source: Census ACS via DataUSA
Zeeland
Home to MillerKnoll (formerly Herman Miller), whose 100-acre Zeeland campus is both its global headquarters and its largest manufacturing site — the anchor of the district's office-furniture industry.
Source: MillerKnoll corporate filings and facilities information
3,000+
Employees at Perrigo's Allegan campus, the consumer-health manufacturer's largest U.S. site, covering production, distribution, and R&D.
Source: Perrigo / Allegan Area Chamber of Commerce

Auto parts and medical devices are real parts of this economy too, but they're spread across smaller suppliers and contract manufacturers rather than concentrated in one or two employers the way furniture is around MillerKnoll or consumer health is around Perrigo. That's not a knock on their importance, it's just why they're harder to put a single, sourceable number on. I'm not going to invent a precision this sector doesn't have.

What the 2025 tariffs actually do

Effective policy, not campaign rhetoric
ActionWhat it doesRelevance to this district
Section 232 steel & aluminum tariffs 25% tariff imposed Feb. 10, 2025; doubled to 50% effective June 4, 2025. Expanded in August 2025 to cover 407 additional derivative products, including household appliances Raises input costs for any manufacturer buying steel or aluminum — relevant to furniture frames, auto parts, and appliance components alike
"Liberation Day" reciprocal tariffs IEEPA-based tariffs on 80+ countries announced April 2, 2025, ranging from a 10% baseline up to 46% on specific countries Furniture, along with most consumer goods and machinery, generally falls in the 10–25% bracket depending on country of origin — relevant to any importer competing with or supplying MillerKnoll's supply chain
Sources: Congressional Research Service, Presidential 2025 Tariff Actions; White & Case tariff summary

The vote that mattered more than a tariff itself

House Clerk record

On Sept. 16, 2025, the House passed H.Res. 707, 213–211, with Huizenga voting yes. Buried in a routine-looking procedural resolution was a provision suspending Section 202 of the National Emergencies Act through March 31, 2026 — the mechanism Congress would normally use to force a floor vote terminating the "emergency" declarations behind the reciprocal tariffs. Three Republicans broke ranks on this one: Thomas Massie, Kevin Kiley, and Victoria Spartz. Huizenga wasn't one of them. Whatever you think of the tariffs themselves, this vote is arguably the more consequential one, because it's the vote that decided whether Congress could even hold a vote on the tariffs at all.

What's not measured yet: a district-level or even county-level estimate of what these tariffs cost or saved local manufacturers and consumers. That number would need firm-level import data that isn't public at anything close to that granularity, so it isn't here. See Methodology for the sourcing rules, or the Articles index for what else is planned.